師兄你話: "前提係after being screened by technical means, which may include e ...
States may require an add
itional manual hand search of
passengers and cabin
baggage after being screened by technical means,
which may include explosive trace detection.
係 copy 出泥既, 唔係我話既. 而且 appendix 2.2 係 appendix 2 既說明, 所以 spirit 係 o係 appendix 2 度
note the word 'may'. it is not a 'must'. Therefore if the airport staff did take the baggage through the screening and sees nothing suspicious there are no need to do manual search and let go.
if and and if the airport staff sees something suspicious through machine screening and report to senior and then under ceo's pressure to let go then its against the security rule
hk3937 發表於 2016-4-19 10:33
States may require an add
itional manual hand search of
passengers and cabin
我當然知道你quote嗰幾句英文係copy and paste出黎，唔係亦都唔可能出自你手筆。我亦當然知道 "may" 字係解做可以但唔一定，但整段文字嘅意思係話乘客及其行李於通過儀器檢查後，當局仍可但唔一定要再作人手檢查。換言之，儀器安檢係必要，人手檢查唔係必要。而家問題不在於有冇通過人手檢查，而係人同行李冇一起通過任何安檢（包括儀器），請問你引用呢堆英文，對支持特權行為，有乜幫助呢?
樓主: nestse
在線雷達
發表於 2016-4-18 20:51:02
