真人相 report "本人對真人相之己見,不喜勿看/插"

打炮虎

原帖由 cesarking 於 2009-5-18 20:45 發表
I absolutely agree with the poster's view. Honestly speaking, I dont think some reported girls worth high or even full marks in appearance. The real photo taken, very often, is not good looking...

2.有部分的熟客與Agents協議寫報告以求收平d/服務好d (百分之百屬實,此語出自本人與某大Agent的會面),互惠互利;

Citation needed. Or you are involved in defamation.

雅魯王

原帖由 cesarking 於 2009-5-18 20:45 發表
I absolutely agree with the poster's view. Honestly speaking, I dont think some reported girls worth high or even full marks in appearance. The real photo taken, very often, is not good looking...

An ...

2.有部分的熟客與Agents協議寫報告以求收平d/服務好d (百分之百屬實,此語出自本人與某大Agent的會面),互惠互利;
服務好d, in 唔 include容易d book, 未出ad事先call 你睇版等等優惠呢??

cesarking

原帖由 milook 於 2009-5-18 21:17 發表


2.有部分的熟客與Agents協議寫報告以求收平d/服務好d (百分之百屬實,此語出自本人與某大Agent的會面),互惠互利;
3.寫報告的人時間多 (本人感得寫報告很浪費資源, 自問真正做事並與某大Agent的會面的男人不可能會寫 ...

Dear Milook,

Honestly, do you still think your above statements logicall after serious consideration? I'm afraid you haven't noticed.

Hint: One fundamental difference between Chinese and English. Why English has grammar while Chinese doesnt?
      

Regards
Cesarking

[ 本帖最後由 cesarking 於 2009-5-18 21:39 編輯 ]

cesarking

原帖由 打炮虎 於 2009-5-18 21:22 發表


Citation needed. Or you are involved in defamation.

Dear 打炮虎

I'm abit disappointed by your comment.

Regards
Cesarking

milook

原帖由 cesarking 於 2009-5-18 21:28 發表



Dear Milook,

Honestly, do you still have your statements logical after serious consideration?

Regards
Cesarking

DON'T YOU?

cesarking

原帖由 milook 於 2009-5-18 21:29 發表



DON'T YOU?

Yes. I do

milook

原帖由 cesarking 於 2009-5-18 21:30 發表


Yes. I do

PROVE IT...............!!

打炮虎

原帖由 cesarking 於 2009-5-18 21:29 發表


Dear 打炮虎

I'm abit disappointed by your comment.

Regards
Cesarking

I don't give a damn. Causing you feel disappointed does not mean that you can get rid of showing any testification for what you have said.

milook

原帖由 cesarking 於 2009-5-18 21:30 發表


Yes. I do

現貼上此『自問真正做事的男人不可能會寫並與某大Agent的會面的男人』的分享

(以下是否報告乎?或是我等小輩無知?)


TST Yuki-真正值得好報告的性感迷人囡囡(發表於 2008-4-8 21:26)
http://141hongkong.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=159300

真實"索"女報告:Ella, Mika, 冰冰 (part1)(發表於 2008-6-25 02:03)
http://141hongkong.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=195124

真實"索"女報告:Ella, Mika, 冰冰 (part2)(發表於 2008-6-25 18:51)
http://141hongkong.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=195404

TST Hotel Cat 服務型成熟囡囡(發表於 2008-4-7 12:31)
http://141hongkong.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=158660

[ 本帖最後由 milook 於 2009-5-18 21:36 編輯 ]

黃賭獨

原帖由 jt1 於 2009-5-18 16:59 發表

唉....算啦, 明白我講乜嘅人睇完後已經明白, 唔明白或者係寫手(出report的人, 唔係講話係唔係agent)嘅人同佢哋嘈都等同貶低自己, so 請不喜勿看/插.

我明白 .................. 你正一又食又拎又白痴又嘈生晒
1. 開左咁多年a/c, 得果幾個post 無貢獻, 此為之白食 (寄生蟲)
2. 已經無貢獻, 仲要屈人地,無權限又要免費睇真人相, 此為白拎 (賴皮)
3. 您咁大個人無思考能力既咩, ching 好多時覆貼都有賺有彈, 人地出包膠又閱讀障礙 (白痴)
4. 又要睇人包膠, 又要上, 上完又嘈, 包您生仔啊?  您覺得呢度好多agent 咁您以後咪鬼幫襯酒店囉, 自己返大陸搵囡囡囉, 無貢獻又喺度嘈生晒

樓主您好無品, 句句都串人, 人地幫襯囡囡奉旨比您架, 唔信就離開酒店區, 包您唔會唔開心,

學您果句:

本人對真人相之己見,不喜勿看/插"

"呢位樓主"可能患上閱讀障礙(疑似個案only)定係其它原因(崩口人忌崩口碗?),  令到佢哋唔係咁高興, 首先我喺呢度致意萬分歉意.  

milook

原帖由 cesarking 於 2009-5-18 21:28 發表



Dear Milook,

Honestly, do you still think your above statements have logical after serious consideration? I's afraid you haven't noticed.

Hint: One fundamental difference between Chinese and En ...

轉載自2009-05-17 蘋果日報
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/te ... amp;coln_id=3530511

比拼英文好

華人用英文寫作，易惹是非。首先，一定會招來其他在美國學院讀過一點洋博士書的文人非議，說這句那章「不合文法」。
什麼叫「文法」？以英語為母語的寫作人，都不理什麼文法。因為學文法，像學劍一樣，只一招一式記牢劍譜，永遠成不了劍道大家。像學獨孤九劍一樣，最後把劍譜通通忘了，理論都融在行為裏，就是名師了。
中港台的英語教學，太注重文法。英語在生活之中，不斷演進：昨天還很嚴謹的「文法」，今日就可以打破。像總統奧巴馬，英美的評論，戲稱他為 A Can-do President─所謂 Can-do，不但不是一個形容詞，而且還不可以成為一個詞，為什麼今天卻成立？
有一齣電影，剛剛上演，情節懸疑，動作驚慄。《泰晤士報》的權威影評，說這部戲 Gripping from start to finish─意思是「由頭到尾，扣人心弦」。
問一問英文半碗水的「學者」，他會把辭典找出來，指指點點： start和 finish，主要作動詞用，更正確的「文法」應該是 beginning和 end。
與這種人爭論英文之正誤，是浪費時間，因為「學者」幾十年見到的英文，是學報刊登枯燥艱深裝腔作勢的英文，不是動感多姿的生活英文，熱愛框條，擁抱銬鐐，中國人的思想多框框，結結巴巴地學英語，做慣了奴隸，也很難例外。
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing。做洋奴，已經很可憐，當英文文法的洋奴，更為下等。世上叫人作嘔的事有許多，其中一種，是兩個自以為英文很好的中國人在為一英文文法的問題爭得面紅耳赤，最後喊起來：「讓我們找一個洋人，叫洋人來評說誰對誰不對好了！」這種醜陋場面，我見過。
許多年前，民國《大公報》記者周榆瑞，用英文寫作，在英國出了一本書。周妻是美國女人，名叫維珍妮。有一位中國朋友看了書，問周榆瑞：「你寫完了，交給嫂夫人潤飾的？」
周榆瑞說：「我答覆道：『我的英文比她寫得好，因為她是美國人。』我說的是老實話，但看了這位朋友的臉色，好像受了很大震撼。」
周榆瑞夠「寸」。但接下來，就有了中國文人慣見之酸：「我在世界論壇社當編輯時，曾用紅筆刪改過美國人和英國人的文章，這件得意事，從來沒提過。」編輯就是要改稿，給洋人改稿，有什麼好得意的？這種驕狂，後世切不可學。周先生鬱鬱而終，在倫敦，我曾想拜訪過他，惜無緣相見。


（陶傑）

打炮虎

原帖由 cesarking 於 2009-5-18 21:28 發表



Dear Milook,

Honestly, do you still think your above statements logicall after serious consideration? I'm afraid you haven't noticed.

Hint: One fundamental difference between Chinese and Englis ...

It has nothing to do with grammar or not. Grammar cannot resolve the paradox that you criticise the reports, but on the other hand you yourself have written quite a number of report. Don't you try to avoid testifying what you have said. We still need your testification.

anklebreaker

無計, 有d人唔想貢獻 (2年內10分權限 )想睇真人相又無得睇
咪响度葡萄lor

cesarking

原帖由 打炮虎 於 2009-5-18 21:22 發表


Citation needed. Or you are involved in defamation.

Alright, Damage to the plaintiff has to be idenified to be an element of defamation.

打炮虎

原帖由 cesarking 於 2009-5-18 21:46 發表


Alright, Damage to the plaintiff has to be idenified to be an element of defamation.

The more time you waste on avoiding the testification, the more the others can see how unreasonable you are. You just waste time fooling around here. I am still waiting for you to testify what you have said.

聆風

講真
人地出相你又屌。唔出相你又屌
咁不如叫小記閂撚左個台佢啦。人地出 REPORT 諗住分享俾大家
日撚日打咁撚多字你估好過引架？？
再講。人地可能搵到個錢所以食多的。你又唔撚抵得人地食咁多又話人地係 AGENT 又成
大哥。可能你自己一個月搵得幾千蚊食唔到咁多女女就唔好話尻人啦
平心而論。唔岩睇既你咪唔好入去人地個 POST 睇囉。人地又無逼尻你入去個 POST 睇　
係唔係先 ?
至於靚唔靚真係好主觀架喎。咁你都搵到位入尻人真係好撚野啦你～
樓主。你出生係哩個世界上真係燈你老母悲哀。食飽飯無野做
我深信食不到的葡萄是酸的哩個道理

[ 本帖最後由 聆風 於 2009-5-18 21:54 編輯 ]

cesarking

原帖由 打炮虎 於 2009-5-18 21:42 發表


It has nothing to do with grammar or not. Grammar cannot resolve the paradox that you criticise the reports, but on the other hand you yourself have written quite a number of report. Don't you try t ...

"We" stand for whom?

求你講清楚

原帖由 聆風 於 2009-5-18 21:49 發表
講真
人地出相你又屌。唔出相你又屌
咁不如叫小記閂撚左個台佢啦。人地出 REPORT 諗住分享俾大家
日撚日打咁撚多字你估好過引架？？
再講。人地可能搵到個錢所以食多的。你又唔撚抵得人地食咁多又話人地係 AGENT 又成
大 ...

Good message !!! later add U marks

milook

原帖由 cesarking 於 2009-5-18 21:28 發表



Dear Milook,

Honestly, do you still think your above statements logicall after serious consideration? I'm afraid you haven't noticed.

Hint: One fundamental difference between Chinese and Englis ...

比拼英文好

華人用英文寫作，易惹是非。首先，一定會招來其他在美國學院讀過一點洋博士書的文人非議，說這句那章「不合文法」。


正面回應!!!!     

cesarking

原帖由 打炮虎 於 2009-5-18 21:49 發表


The more time you waste on avoiding the testification, the more the others can see how unreasonable you are. You just waste time fooling around here. I am still waiting for you to testify what you h ...

Just pm you my phone no. Feel free to call me.