全盛時期大哨同c丹邊個勁d?????

kit_@

小第覺得c丹會係勁dd,雖然大哨既入球能力同埋技術真係到現在都無人做得番,但係足球場上中場既工作量係遠比前鋒多好多,再加上位置係進攻中場的話,更加多野要做,仲有,c丹無速度,全靠技術過人,但又無咩人可以搶到佢個波,射門技術又高,睇下歐冠決賽對利華個球就知佢幾勁,十褸咁高既傳中都可以比佢咁有型既姿勢射得咁靚,又一個人帶起一隊法國囉走世界杯同歐國杯,呢一方面我覺得只有馬勒當拿先可以平起平坐喇,咁....大家又有咩高見呢???

jayjay2009

I like c丹

70861945

大哨又點可以同Ｃ丹比呢
我覺得Ｃ丹嘅級數係後無來者
如果只計級數...大哨可以同伯金..或者我嘅偶像巴冶奧..鍊下

魚柳飽

c丹好, 夠全面
attack, pass, assist, defence everything is good


大哨只係進攻, 佢進攻時無人能阻, 有次對方扯晒衫都阻唔到
但other parts

十二仔

又係呢D問題

中場同前鋒矛得比

最基本2個位置唔同
中場講求技術,需要兼故既範疇很多
包括進攻&防守
係串連後防同前鋒既一條橋樑
萬人中場打得唔好,前邊就冇波到

而前鋒既責任就簡單得多
就係將波送入網

tinman1102

大哨既威力,真係十年內都無一個做番6成wow但係...............

tigerb

I think Zinedine Zidane is better than Ronaldo Luis Nazário de Lima (Ronaldo )
Since  France(Zinedine Zidane) vs Brazil(Ronaldo) at 1998 FIFA World Cup result is 3:0
&       France(Zinedine Zidane) vs Brazil(Ronaldo) at 2006 FIFA World Cup result is 1:0
There is total loss with direct VS match games for Ronaldo.

kit_@

原帖由 tigerb 於 2008-12-10 23:43 發表
I think Zinedine Zidane is better than Ronaldo Luis Nazário de Lima (Ronaldo )
Since  France(Zinedine Zidane) vs Brazil(Ronaldo) at 1998 FIFA World Cup result is 3:0
&       France(Zinedine Zidane) v ...

ya~~~~你講得好岩呀

deng

c丹 is better

tigerb

thank you           .

周百通

兩個唔同類型球員好難比,
但我覺得C丹係核心, 好難搵到代替
前鋒只要肯比錢一定搵到

yamamoto

兩位球員好難比較
因為大家都唔同位置
一個係前鋒一個係中場

sosoboy1

zidane 唔算無速度 platini, hoddle仲慢.
如果從成就來講大家平手
球品ronaldo好少少, zidane响球場上其實有時都幾....
個人品行zidane勝, 佢係出名ge好男人, 反觀ronaldo就....
但ronaldo傳奇性就真係...經過咁嚴重受傷都仲可以2002帶領巴西嬴世界杯

我個人應為ronaldo始終係足球史上其中一位最閃亮巨星, 佢全盛期果種無堅不摧ge威力後來的zidane,kaka,ronaldinho, c7,messi都未能做到

tigerb

The achievement is similar.In fact France(Zinedine Zidane) vs Brazil(Ronaldo) at 1998 FIFA World Cup & 2006 FIFA World Cup.
France(Zinedine Zidane) is win for both matchs.
This is no point in Ronaldo is better than Zinedine Zidane.
Because football is 勝者為王

[ 本帖最後由 tigerb 於 2008-12-13 16:19 編輯 ]

funnyman

咁保方同美斯邊個勁d？

sosoboy1

原帖由 tigerb 於 2008-12-13 16:13 發表
The achievement is similar.In fact France(Zinedine Zidane) vs Brazil(Ronaldo) at 1998 FIFA World Cup & 2006 FIFA World Cup.
France(Zinedine Zidane) is win for both matchs.
This is no point in Ronaldo  ...

If your point is winner is the best then where do you put

George Best (never been in any world cup or euro cup)
Eusebio (only semi-finals in world cup)
Puskas (loser to w.germany in world cup)
Cruyff (losers twice in world cup finals)

No one can tell you who is the better of the two, because personal opinions comes into it.

tigerb

Cruyff is showed at 1974 FIFA World Cup only & never show at 1978 FIFA World Cup &
Eusebio (only semi-finals in world cup) is lose by  England-Bobby Charlton (1966 FIFA World Cup-winner)
& Ferenc Puskás(Hungary) from 1952(Olympic Champions) to 1954 world cup semi-finals period is never lose by one match,
you know why they are say as 球王


Also,different people,different point of view

[ 本帖最後由 tigerb 於 2008-12-14 02:15 編輯 ]

sosoboy1

原帖由 tigerb 於 2008-12-13 16:56 發表
Cruyff is showed at 1974 FIFA World Cup only & never show at 1978 FIFA World Cup &
Eusebio (only semi-finals in world cup) is losed by  England-Bobby Charlton (1966 FIFA World Cup-winner)
& Ferenc P ...

you got my point, different people will have different opinions.

there is hardly any definite answer in these things. winner does not means they are the best among all.

tigerb

Thanks for your sharing.
From my point of view,I believe the physical result more than theoretical comparison.I know that one is
Forward & one is Midfielders but they are footballer
.They have same target ,they want to win & get the football Champions.From my point of view,I can not find another
better method to compare of them.
Anyway,thanks for your reply

[ 本帖最後由 tigerb 於 2008-12-14 02:05 編輯 ]

sexkeikei

滾．．就大哨勁好多

波．．就一定係施丹