請問這句子有錯嗎?

米高奧雲

請問這句子有錯嗎?

These are John's trousers, please give it to him..
小朋友問我這問題,褲子是一條的,所以要用it,除非有兩條..

小朋友的同學覺得trousers是眾數,所以要用please give them to him.但小朋友覺得要用it

咁究竟要用it定係them???

HKOXSEX

Trousers. scissors, glasses etc. 先天有 s ...

These are John's trousers, please give it to him.

應該用 them. 因為 There are 已說明多過 one pair of trousers.

ICAN

HKOXSEX 發表於 2016-1-6 12:43
Trousers. scissors, glasses etc. 先天有 s ...

These are John's trousers, please give it to him.

讃同
老師重話:
These are John's trousers, please give it to him
這是兩句子,中間用個comma分開有問題

auraheart

咁會唔會巧D呢?

These are John's trousers.  Give them to him, please.  

If trousers were rice or air, a non-count item, then it could be written differently.
矛得數 (空氣, 水) 或難數 (米,沙)...一律用 It   

米高奧雲

咁如果係兩條褲,仍用These are John's trousers 嗎?咁咪分唔到有幾多條褲lor..有冇辦法令讀者知道有幾多條褲??

auraheart

米高奧雲 發表於 2016-1-7 11:31
咁如果係兩條褲,仍用These are John's trousers 嗎?咁咪分唔到有幾多條褲lor..有冇辦法令讀者知道有幾多條褲??

These two are John's trousers.  

These two pairs of trousers are John's. 較正路...
小弟個人認為人家明解就掂, 母需太執着文法.

ICAN

auraheart 發表於 2016-1-7 12:39
These two are John's trousers.  

These two pairs of trousers are John's. 較正路...

香港學校薑化左,
唔比有唔同

auraheart

ICAN 發表於 2016-1-10 20:40
香港學校薑化左,
唔比有唔同

禾地巧隨便, 最緊要識, 用就隨意...對方明白就巧.
Formal writing 就要汁到正.
英文始終在香港是第二語言, 點都差D, 薑化左有佢既道理...
禾香港工作時秘書是港大英文系畢業, 英語會話流暢度比不上一般外國人...

ICAN

auraheart 發表於 2016-1-10 20:48
禾地巧隨便, 最緊要識, 用就隨意...對方明白就巧.
Formal writing 就要汁到正.

這個當然
而家香港學生講唔掂英文
就係糾枉過正,忽略實用

馬後砲

當年，我問過教我英文的鬼婆老師， trousers 點解用眾數，
佢話， 因為 有两個褲管， 示範 話 “one....two..... see ? ”
自始永遠記得 ！  

Gold007

點解我會唔識答

ICAN

Gold007 發表於 2016-1-16 21:12
點解我會唔識答

因為唔係西人
唔識D敵文都好正常

馬後砲

Gold007 發表於 2016-1-16 21:12
點解我會唔識答

因為乃唔鍾意著褲？  

馬後砲

ICAN 發表於 2016-1-17 13:20
因為唔係西人
唔識D敵文都好正常

在香港好蝕章

ICAN

馬後砲 發表於 2016-1-17 19:19
在香港好蝕章

唔識普通話就輸點數