|
|
樓主 |
發表於 2013-11-11 14:19:26
|
顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 rex4 於 2013-11-11 14:21 編輯
Raptor 發表於 2013-11-11 13:47 
回復 rex4 #1 的帖子
Yes.....I do think we have the right to know the cause of death! Truly a stupid ...
Agree totally, we absolutely have every right to know the cause, they are only civil servants and nothing more, and they have duty to explain every action that they are acting for us. We will not ask for the explanation if that is not a stupid decision. We give them the right not to speak, only if they are trust worthy, when they are not to be trusted, we need to put them on a stand and have them explain every decision in detail.
The stupid woman made a stupid speech publicly, in saying they have the right not to speak on their decision, should we let someone as stupid as her to make decisions for us. She should be fired and dismissed for such a speech, and never be employed as a Hong Kong civil servant again.
完全同意，我們絕對有權利知道原因，他們只是公務員，僅此而已，他們有責任為我們講解每一個決定。
如果這不是一個愚蠢的決定，我們不會要求他們解釋的。
只有當他們是值得信任, 我們給他們不講解的權利，當他們不被信任，我們需要他們詳細解釋每件事的立場。
八婆公開講的說話好愚蠢，說他們有權利不解釋他們的決定，我們應該讓這愚蠢的八婆替我們做決定嗎? 她應該被解僱因講這樣的說話，永遠不會再被聘用為香港公務員。 |
|
樓主: rex4
在線雷達
發表於 2013-11-11 13:47:50
發表於 2013-11-11 13:57:42
其實3個都有問題
為左一個小小既商營電視牌照,而倒行逆思,付出政治,狠班子有乜好處值得咁做
今舖當你狠英大石責死蟹贏左,就汰o下狠英同行會往後日子要付出幾大既政治代價....狠英咁既行事思維,維一出路....保外就E
