[求助]關於網上中介人問題

蕭塞豐乳中

假如我經營一個貨品交易既網站，讓買賣雙方有一個平台交易。

如果賣方的貨品係A貨，我作為網站的負責人，有否觸犯法例？

[ 本帖最後由 蕭塞豐乳中 於 2009-6-10 14:59 編輯 ]

raywoo

原帖由 蕭塞豐乳中 於 2009-6-10 11:15 發表
假如我經營一個貨品交易既網站，讓買賣雙方有一個平台交易。

如果賣方的貨品係A貨，我作為網站的負責人，有否觸犯法例？

In US,  Tiffany 之前告過 eBay, 但最终好似入唔到 as at  14/7/08.  

EBay Inc. won a significant victory over jeweler Tiffany & Co. in a federal-court ruling that sets a clear limit on how far online retailers have to go in policing trademarks on U.S. Web sites.

The ruling came down decisively in favor of eBay and other e-commerce companies and against Tiffany and other trademark holders, which are trying to hold the Internet companies liable for the sale of counterfeit goods.  Quoted from WSJ 15/7/08.

最重要可能是呢點:
The standard is not whether eBay could reasonably anticipate possible infringement,” Judge Sullivan wrote, “but rather whether eBay continued to supply its services to sellers when it knew or had reason to know of infringement by those sellers. . . . Here, when Tiffany put eBay on notice of specific items that Tiffany believed to be infringing, eBay immediately removed those listings.”

In effect, the court vindicated eBay’s so-called VeRO (Verified Rights Owners) program. Under that program, eBay provides brand-owners like Tiffany with software enabling them to identify specific eBay listings that the brand owner believes involve counterfeit goods. eBay then removes those listings (within 24 hours in 90 percent of the cases, and within four hours in 75% of the cases, according to evidence presented at trial last November).  Quoted from Fortune.


P.S  Tiffany 有上訴 Aug 08.  但唔结果.
   LVMH, Dior, Hermes ...... 都有告eBay in France.  Lancome Vs eBay in Brussels 但唔结果.  I think the court cases are not finished yet.

[ 本帖最後由 raywoo 於 2009-6-10 19:15 編輯 ]

蕭塞豐乳中

Thank You!

white小白

小白評:

• 網上拍賣平台, 一般上都有聲明拍賣活動係會員個別責任. 但網站卻有監管責任.
• 網站對於某些侵權物品, 以及給予會員認證的準則, 應加予監管.

舉例:

Global Source與Alibaba同為B2B網站, 係世界上最有名的兩個貿易平台.

• Global Source在百慕達註冊, NASDAQ上市.
• Alibaba在香港註冊, 公開板上市.

小白最質疑係Alibaba, 因為它所謂金牌會員, 信賴會員, 曾多次被其他會員舉報投訴, 說是虛假會員, 查證並無該公司等等.

建議受騙會員經香港律師提出申訴. 香港執業律師應該多謝我幫佢地宣傳.

另外:

亦帶出一個問題.

• 四台會員若在本論壇發出虛假報告, 本版執行禁言是明智之舉.
• 禁言動作, 同EBAY公司刪除會藉或刪除相關廣告是同等道理.
• 發出虛假報告之會員, 亦會受到法律制裁.

所以小白在此亦想提醒會員:

• 請會員審慎用詞.
• 若有會員因受惡意中傷之誹謗而提出申訴, 警方調查時, 四台亦有權力交出該誹謗會員之IP, 警方好快就會請該會員返警局調查. 必要時甚至拘捕.