|
|
發表於 2014-5-8 23:35:45
|
顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 made_in_HK 於 2014-5-9 00:03 編輯
ironman75 發表於 2014-5-8 19:01 
回復 made_in_HK #19 的帖子
"HOW FALSE? SINCE YOU ARE IN AMERICA, HAVE YOU NOT SEEN ELECTION AND ANY OTHER TIME? DID YOU NOT SEE POLITICIAN TRY TO RALLY VOTES FROM VOTER? IS THAT NOT " NONSENSE, AND READ WHAT YOU JUST WROTE. YOU JUST FURTHER EMBARRASSED YOURSELF. 
"PEOPLE CAN MAKE FOOLISH ACTION OR WHAT SO EVER NEGATIVE OR BAD BEHAVIOR, ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN APPROPRIATELY, CAN A GOVERNMENT OFFICER DO SO BY NOT HAVING ANY CONSEQUENCES? IF THEY WANT, THEY CAN BUT DO EXPECT PUBLIC ACTION AND BE READY TO TAKE THE CONSEQUENCES." YOU OBVIOUSLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT ACTUALLY IS GOING ON IN AMERICA. READ WHAT I WROTE ABOUT THE BUNDY'S RANCH A FEW WEEKS AGO, GO DO SOME RESEARCH ON YOUR OWN, AND COME BACK AND TELL ME IF THERE IS ANY CONSEQUENCES FOR WRONG DOING BY THE GOVERNMENT. GO READ ABOUT RANGEL, TELL ME IF THERE WAS ANY CONSEQUENCES FOR WRONG DOING BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT...
"I M NOT FROM USA, MAY BE YOU CAN ENLIGHTEN HERE? I DO UNDERSTAND SUCH CRITICISED WAS MEANT FOR GOOD FOR THE GOVERNMENT OPERATION TO DO BETTER AS IF THE PUBLIC IS WATCHING AND PUBLIC RAISE VOICE, PARTICULAR THE EDUCATED ONE. THOSE WITH STATUS AND WRITTEN POWER COLLARS." FINALLY, YOU GOT TO THE POINT. YOU BOUGHT INTO THE AMERICAN PROPAGANDA AND YOU'RE BLOWING SMOKE FROM ALL YOUR REPLIES. LET'S HEAR SOME FACTS. LET'S NOT HEAR FICTION.
"READ THE COMPARISON, ARE YOU SAYING IS NOT RIGHT? THOSE WHO ARE IN THE US OR WESTERN COUNTRIES, IF A PERSON IS CONTRIBUTING IN SCIENCE, ART, IT....ETC. DIDNT THIS GROUP OF PEOPLE GET REWARDED ? OR YOUR MIND ARE SET ON ONE PARTICULAR CASE? INSTEAD OF LOOKING AS A COUNTRY FREEDOM AND OPENESS?
CRITICISED COULD HAVE GO CONSTRUCTIVE AND NON-CONSTRUCTIVE.... I DONT THINK THIS REFER TO THE SINGULAR CASE. BUT WHEN I COMPARE TO CHINA, ARE YOU SAYING THIS IS NOT TRUE?
IN USA, I GUESS WHEN YOU CRITICISED ABOUT GOVERNMENT , THE MEDIA IS OPEN TO PUBLISH, SOME MIGHT RECEIVED AWARD IN SOME FORM OF LITETATURE OR WRITTEN ARTICLE,..... I BELIEVED IS OPENESS, IN CHINA? COMPARISON NOT CORRECT?"
You have no base to compare, so there was no comparison. If you're going to cite an article, use one that uses facts and data. And does it really matter where this BS article came from? No, BS is BS and it doesn't matter who wrote it or where it came from. You want to continue with some comparison, so me some FACTS AND DATA, and I might entertain you. Show me some FACTS to back your opinion.
"IN ECONOMIC LONG TERM BORROWING IT DOESNT SEEMS GOOD FOR USA, I AGREE. DID I SAID US IS GOOD? BUT AS A COMPARISON ARE YOU SAYING THIS IS NOT THE SITUATION? " HOW CAN IT BE GOOD FOR THE CITIZENS WHEN THEY'RE THE ONES WHO WILL HAVE TO PAY FOR IT VIA TAX DOLLARS? WHAT, YOU THINK OBAMA IS GOING TO PAY FOR IT WITH HIS OWN MONEY?
"甚少" DOESNT MEAN NO. YOU ARE IN US, YOU HAS TO BE RIGHT IF YOU SAY THERE ARE SUBJECT FOR POLITICS, BUT DO YOU KNOW WHAT KIND OF POLITICS? 1 PARTIES? MULTI PARTIES STUDY? OR TO SHARE AND LEARN WHAT IS THE DIFFERENT OF ALL THE PARTIES? THIS IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM CHINA 1 PARTY POLITICS STUDY. "精英都很爱国" THIS PART TRUE OR NOT I AM NOT SURE, DID YOU HEAR OR READ ABOUT MANY US TOP SCHOLLAR MIGRATING TO OTHER COUNTRY? THE COMPARISON NOT CORRECT?
SO YOU DON'T KNOW EVEN KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON AND YOU'RE CITING THAT ARTICLE WAS A GOOD ARTICLE? IF YOU TRULY WANT TO LEARN, MAYBE YOU CAN PAY MORE ATTENTION TO WHAT I HAVE BEEN POSTING ON HERE, FOR YEARS, AND DRAW YOUR OWN CONCLUSION.
"MAJORITY OF THE AMERICANS HATE CHINESE" FROM THIS STATEMENT I KNOW WHAT KIND OF ASIAN ARE YOU IN US. AS I WAS LIVING IN WHITE MAN SOCIAL CIRCLE FOR 8YEARS. I MIXED AND BLEND INTO THEIR LIVING STANDARD. UNLIKE MANY RICH ASIAN WHO MOVE TO NZ, THEY COME TO SCHOOL/UNI WITH FLASH CAR, FLASH ACCESSORIES, CLOTHING, .......... AND MANY WHITE MAN BLACK MAN KIDS ARE NOT BEING GIVEN LOTS OF ALLOWANCE UNLIKE ASIAN KIDS. YOU ARE ONE RICH ASIAN, GOOD ON YOU. WHEN I WAS WITH THIS LOCAL, THIS ARE THE ENVY AND JEALOUSY THAT CAUSE THE "HATRED" AS YOU MENTIONS. IMAGINE YOU HOME COUNTRY YOU SURROUNDING ARE BEING LIKE THIS IMMIGRANT. US LIKE TRADITIONAL , BECAUSE THEY DONT HAVE MUCH AS IT IS A INTERSTING CULTURAL FOR MANY WESTERNERS. CHINA NOT LEARING FROM THE LATEST ADVANCE IN ALL FIELD FROM MANY COUNTRIES? AMERICA IS A HUGE COUNTRY, IN CASE YOU DON'T REALIZE. AND DISCRIMINATION STILL EXISTS, IN CASE YOU DON'T KNOW. THE AMERICAN PROPAGANDA HAVE BRAINWASHED MAJORITY OF THE AMERICANS THAT CHINA IS THE USA'S HEAD ENEMY.
"http://china.adoption.com/ AND YOU MAY SEARCH ALL THE ADOPTION RELATED ARTICLE, IS NOT A BAD READING. LOOK AT THE COMPARISON ARE YOU SAYING NOT TRUE ON CHINA SIDE? " NOT GOVERNMENTAL OFFICIAL DATA. AGAIN, SHOW ME SOME FACTS AND DATA, AND NOT AN ADVERTISEMENT.
FOR US PART AT LEAST THIS IS QUITE CONSISTENT. CHINA WOULD BE DIFFERENT HANDLING ON DIFFERENT CASE. FOR SOVEIGNITY CHINA CAN BE TOUGH TOWARDS JAPAN, MILD TOWARD NORTH KOREA, SOUTH KOREA, PHILIPPINE, VIETNAM, MALAYSIA, INDIA, BRUNEI, TAIWAN...ETC. VERY QUITE AND NO ACTION TOWARDS RUSSIA.
CHINA GOVERNMENT CARE ABOUT THEIR ACTION TOWARDS THE PEOPLE? WHAT? HOW'S THE USA DEALING WITH AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST?
|
|
樓主: ironman75
在線雷達
