Intellectual property

MATTHEW194

thx for sharing. but i just to raise a question to the 版主, is plagiarism allowed in this forum?  cause it seems like everyone is copy and pasting all the craps from the net and no one gives a shit about it.

http://big5.visittibet.cn/travel/510.html
even the title is the same as the website and he never intended to show the source of origin.

barying

回復 MATTHEW194 #17 的帖子

Your concern is highly appreciated!

Of course we fully encourage the originality.

Personally, I dislike members just copy and pasting to post. At least they make some adjustment or put some personal comment.

I hope you understand I couldn't check all information of the post where the members copy from.
And the other problem is who can certify the original.

So if any contacts from the copyright owners that they are not permission the sharing in here.

We would certainly to delete the post.

MATTHEW194

回復 barying #19 的帖子

ok, thx for the reply
don't get me wrong, i am not trying to make your job harder nor am i questioning your authorities
but i am just sick of people who are awarded for the non-efforting posts( shouldn't they at least clarify the author or the source?)

tigerb 註言 (2012-10-30 02:27):
Doesn't matter about clarify the author or the source if the content involve the rights of copyright owners or copyright law.Anyway,thx for your suggestion.

補充內容 (2012-10-30 02:41):
if you say it doesn't matter, okay then, i respect that and i am not in the position to make further judgements.

tigerb 註言 (2012-10-30 02:51):
You are welcome

barying

回復 MATTHEW194 #20 的帖子

I have never care about it has authority or obligation at all.

As you say it is a hardest job for me to handling the post here.

So I always try my best to operate this forum.

Can let people coming to share, coming to watch, and coming to communicate between each other .

MATTHEW194

回復 barying #22 的帖子

alright, i get it. it's just a suggestion and you might think it's none of my business. there are a few things i want to raise i am an internet writer too believe it or not, sometimes i sell my previous year uni essays to some websites for educational purposes. and i am annoyed when i see people just stealing other peoples work. i think you don't have to be a genius to identify who is coping infos and who is not, just type the title in the google and you will see.i even see some people just caping all the shits from the wiki without changing a single word. this is absolutely bogus. but i understand your situation, if you ban the people from sharing "other peoples works", there wouldn't be anyone posting cause everyone are lazy pigs here. i wanted to share a few essays on topics like asexual, problems associated with viagra and shits like that. but that got me into two questions, firstly, who is going to understand it or even be interested ( what's the point of posting if no one is reading it). secondly, you guys might even think i am just copy and pasting it anyways, cause that's what everyone does here.
don't worry, sir. no more questions from me and this would certainly be my last post in this forum.

補充內容 (2012-10-31 01:38):
reply to tigerb: haha, thx for your advice and i always do. but i am disturbed when i see pigs get fat. hehe, i hope you know what i mean.  

開心加加

倆位高人真有深度!

typhoonno8

回復 MATTHEW194 #3 的帖子

I can't agree more.  Citation is not a problem but telling the source is the minimal respect people should show.  Maybe I'm too old school.

Regarding the phenomenon of pirate posts getting more reward points, well, that's life and I just can't care less.

so appreciate the good ones and be happy!

MATTHEW194

回復 typhoonno8 #7 的帖子

thx for supporting, buddy. appreciate it. but i think the 版主 is right, that's just the way how they run the forum. it's not that they haven't recognised the issue here, but they choose to ignore it due to different reasons. apparently. there are no rules or regulations in providing protections for the originalities of the writer and everyone couldn't be care less. so i guess that's nothing wrong with what's happening here, everyone seems to be happy,but it's just not the kind of place that suits us the best.

barying

回復 MATTHEW194 #8 的帖子

Matthew 兄，容許這次我用中文回覆，其實我的英文水平很低，怕會詞不達意，見諒。

小弟很明白閣下的論點，我們作為一個開放平台，
在現代社會知識產權意識之下，很應該負上一些責任的。

但相對來說，正因為我們是一個開放平台，而所有會員，包括這裏作為管理者其一的我。
大家都是沒有任何實質利益能收取的，而我們之所以能聚集一起，
有些是因為與趣、有些是因為無聊，其實大家都是希望有個地方聚一聚吧。

或者你都會理解，網路與現實的分別吧，在這裏，我們並不會用真面目示人。
當大家都很享受這裏的氣氛，在現實之外找一個心靈寄托，
今天回家看看有什麼人分享了有趣的東西、
跟相熟的師兄聊一聊天、
覺得有人發表了不錯的主題而評一評分，希望他再接再勵。
在我個人來說，這裏就是這麽簡單。

在此我並不是在替自己辯護，在這次的例子："世界遺產中的美麗風景"
如我在google中尋找，你也會看到那個結果吧。

正如我所說，假若有產權持有人向本站作出投訴，我們必定認真處理的。

在我之前的回覆中，有一樣我要重伸的，就是這一句：
I have never care about it has authority or obligation at all.
我自己越看越不對板，可能是文法錯誤吧。
其實我是想說：
我並沒有因為我是版主，就自視擁有無上權力與必然要做的義務；
反之，我認為自己既是一名版主，也是一名會員，
我能力所及的我都很樂意去做，為的是維繫一個各給所需的平台予大家。

最後，誠邀閣下評價小弟的劣作，雖是很久以前的一帖了。
如覺得此帖不值一晒，還請多多包函；
如覺得該帖勉強合格的話，希望閣下明白小弟對於一篇好帖的標準。
香港自然系列：香港郊野公園 (第三章)
http://141hongkong.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=874365&fromuid=196554

MATTHEW194

回復 barying #9 的帖子

i greatly appreciate your time taken to explain to all of us here. i get the message you are getting across. that's certainly no right or wrong about certain things. You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist, i understand that. we am not criticising you as a 版主, i haven't been in this forum for long, but we all know that you tried your hardest in putting this all together. as typhoonno8 said, might be we are too conservative or might be we take things too seriously. but whenever i notice there's sth wrong, i immediately react, that's my way of living and i hope you understand where's my unsatisfaction coming from.

typhoonno8

回復 MATTHEW194 #8 的帖子

Yeah......so I support good posts by giving points and replies, though it is a bit of self-cheating and I indeed compromise what I believe in with silence   

typhoonno8

回復 barying #9 的帖子

Highly appreciate your honesty and willingness to accommodate different opinions .  It is not important that we agree with each other fully but you show traits that modulators should have.